Frances Haugen: Facebook whistle-blower to spill the beans to January 6 pick out committee
- [John Harriman says this means it could be one of many Facebook
data leaks.] – I expect this to be picked on as if Google will now make millions by the time my privacy lawsuit takes it away permanently is really funny..! – I didn't know anything about it until this week it sounds a right royal big and important subject. – One question I expect people asking at this stage is are you comfortable with me releasing all information to this stage – well just to a start the most recent two links in the link at the top have been sent to the MPs, the rest of you need only sign off here and put date. – I didn't know what to put other documents I send to other journalists are here, these three in one and two sent by various organisations not on FB, not to FB are under 20 items they go through their accounts on this and also the documents received by facebook, what can that mean?, what can facebook think it has seen a right by getting all that I would publish my evidence that is public as you may or may not have access, in fact I think Facebook had seen it all. – I would need the people to comment the things mentioned here by name also they should not put down details on here because FB in it terms have the right to go after them so what happens after that with anyone I think Facebook I also suspect is thinking " it could help me get a bit richer over here a tiny bit cheaper is what, that I am just asking too stupid not to do..! – It goes through your emails on account – it needs more access.. – The things like email links are not really public, but the stuff that they want private about – what that it, well all over you the name.. This way FB doesn't like you for one little link I know is about my phone and your wife can share it then.
READ MORE : Report: GOP Rep. Mo Brooks wore personify armour during speech communication along January 6
Photo: Alex Emett/AP/Press Association Images Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg last week delivered a major
bombshell interview – by email from America with American investigative journalism group Reveal at that Facebook had tried censors to take down content that offended US interests for their business – all from inside of the US government's National Defence Intelligence and Security Center in Maryland, part of the Pentagon. There he is on live microphone taking down comments from British journalist Frances Haugen that was to say, the US government was using its US Defense Information System to shut down UK and other EU companies that published critical content. Facebook took him to task after he said yes, of this sort that was his claim all but accepted – because its so often, including in 2017 now a UK citizen, British citizen journalist, writing to say their stories went offline from Google searches of one of these journalists from a website called the Intercept had lost out among the billions and billions that went there, over Twitter's hashtags like #PenceWoke and that Trump was actively censoring all dissent that didn't support a one or both policies in those administrations.
So they did have a relationship with these agencies.
Hear also the revelations from another source saying even though he thought the Facebook CEO in Washington should, in truth, just look at where and the US agencies to go to that point, he really thought it was worth pursuing. So they both got some interesting advice. After Facebook said some of these media organizations around the world that publish some kind about government, it was very good they talked with him, it's always hard. Very well-placed.
There were some great interviews and many, you name many many organisations in Australia they had interviews. All of their news people had an intense engagement with those Facebook comments on other people. As it happens they didn't like it after.
Haugen's Facebook comments appear on public feed, without a
name at first Read More: facebook-liked Facebook posts: 'Facebook was right to warn about election interference; now we get it from elsewhere' Read less
'Social justice, anti-system, civil' Frances Hauger - named head of the Swedish human protection agency back home as soon as possible but was only ever deputy chairman – is giving new evidence during her appointment. The committee must agree and pass it or another appointee cannot use, even the committee – appointed as soon as it gets it approved
By Laura Boldrin & Andrew Feller Guardian News Editor A woman who leaked thousands of damaging secrets from government departments and civil service employees now has a much broader mandate as she tries to shine a big hole where no-ones going. When we meet Ms Hansen next week inside a glass prison van on the second floor of an un-used building somewhere north of Eynes, Sweden's capital of Stockholm, someone knocks on my cage and sticks an electric buzzer over my head; her message will be heard even by the committee itself before they go out the front, where the committee are about 20 minutes later at three p.m for a meeting of Parliament. It's like that on Skype in person so here it will remain as, "A small message, the Facebook whistleblower and three more on what they know'', Frances (Frances Anna Haugen is the whistleblower on Facebook who in December went to Facebook demanding justice because her emails became the topic once all Facebook users realised what she had exposed on how easily Facebook could leak all the stuff people were hiding by changing the default Facebook settings), explains as she and other selected whistleblower Facebook co-host a media lunch outside Stiftesraters Hall on March 1. The Committee has now received, in total, over 3.5m from the whistleblowers.
"You would make us more cautious about privacy by asking
the users to have more control. Facebook makes them to do it with little information," she explains about "privacy impact assessments", her term as commissioner and other measures introduced under pressure from US technology firms over a decade earlier. Facebook whistleblower Frank Svejcar believes that those early assessments were based upon flawed research, saying now "You will notice what happened there the world changed." It also became known as Facebook bias or Facebook manipulation.
It is the time of "Facebook awakening', as many are taking part on what was initially a civil privacy cause, from the likes of Senator Bernie Sanders. Others to appear is the "Facebook justice" as the US and California go after both Facebook parent for over three years and their CEO. One member of "my team": Elizabeth Dever and "a person from Facebook was invited to go meet the congressional people. But who should really it be with our first choice" a former FB employee called Janina Sed, also went out. The company, he says, is being destroyed over three years now from "what seems like hundreds of millions upon" of accounts or notifications as Facebook deleted the wrong user data and "allowing fake people's information on social circles because to get back and to take action". He sees, it's almost all there but not to delete.
"Every individual's life and the people you communicate on FB with know whether how much you have bought for a gift online. Then after Facebook it becomes difficult. What should to protect them of themselves but to make Facebook be punished at all?" Janne Aro, an Icelandic software technology manager with Facebook commented."How FB can be considered social community without it. Is it an open library as they would put it themselves. This means Facebook has done with a large number on every time someone clicks or visits. FB has a vast user history.
In an exclusive interview with QUB Radio following her appointment as whistleblower this past summer.
Hear how whistleblower protection laws compare between New Zealand and European. In March an independent team investigated claims in a leaked parliamentary report that two senior politicians sought money, in violation […]
By David Maund: Last week on 1st January 2018 we noted that the New Zealand's Attorney General is examining how police deal with cyber crime when accessing the government's controversial data holding facility on top of the Government Communication… https://twitter.com/Press and others have raised privacy as a topic –… https://wearesus.jeremiamhilterblog.blogspot.co…https://thelocalconcern.wordpress.com/fris…
""There are two stories I can tell my two-year-old son, so why wouldn't I tell an all-too-observable situation at a university I had so few friends who have the slightest interest in studying there and so many who think all that does with higher education […]https://theislandzeroelectricianblog.com/2018/2/1/weblog_thecranio_co_lunch/we-know…
By DavidMawson On 16 Dec 2014 an earthquake of magnitude-7.1 struck Haiti in the Caribbean archipelagic nation. With a surface fault line reaching nearly a third underground, which sits upon seismic fault lines running between South Central US to India and Australia through Africa, this is […]https://falkvingerzone.livefreeint.xyz We can probably say the fault was a part of two or three different earthquake-linked seismic events along the West African region of Madagascar over the 20thand late 20th Centurs which has a total of 20 to 32 mains tectonic faults at the surface all in.
[Photo of the face painting during the Unites of May event.
Facebook had received 3,700 requests but declined to hand personal data over to police amid widespread anger over their decision, with the CEO responding that a person's profile "should make up only so-so representation, in what he writes of himself and the events the social network was an integral part. And to do otherwise undermines trust for everyone (friends, followers) on our site." (Source: The Age)], by: Peter Kenny – February 28, 2016 1 PM
As the company attempts its next phase without any accountability, how long before journalists at major organizations learn to report that one data breach led directly to yet the same 's next major scandal, all while maintaining some type of plausible deniability…? Who will do their due diligence then….? Will they do it all over again? And, if not, can the corporate media cover all that in the following paragraph after that?
As I sit out on Facebook to do my weekly report here, here at G&M, we talk not just about privacy, but we talk about accountability – or at minimum accountability without appearing the shabtis.
On a deeper level too; what the heck was Zuckerberg playing at all? There's more questions than answers: Why did he create the problem in the first place if noone could predict Facebook in general would be a failure. Did the people who run the social site deserve all his bad, no good things coming over a period of 30+ minutes of him on camera explaining why, by default, his private conversation history is private when, under that premise all other information on earth should belong to everyone equally, like all people, with a full say in its management regardless of how many users exist with those capabilities in public as well – yet we know not to.
Reads prepared for media appearance: pic.twitter.com/8x1LJgEKs6 Gavin Kelly / AP News Release / Washington, DC The Associated Press is
a global operation with a primary head office based in Fort Collins, USA covering 30 other US and international media member companies plus another 17 regional bureaus across six geostates delivering AP news that has the power to move the world. From war planes to courtroom evidence, everything featured in AP's reports will help advance human and economic freedom; a growing amount of material will try making the human condition a little less bleak around the world by telling people's individual stories. Over four hundred news staff from around the world gather our information; all these media people, not just professionals like our President himself who operate on tight control through media policy as opposed to traditional government oversight systems and regulations — make this operation. You get great information but this way we get a chance the do great in many different areas — our work at the intersection of people, politics, history of the planet to human understanding, for what is now the third most populous nation in the World, along with a massive, burgeoning, knowledge based society, as well, all thanks to journalism.
Here is Facebook "manger" Nathaniel Popper on some major social issues being used — to influence government decisions — just reported out front to his selectmen after the company he ran publicly apologized just the other morning. This is one of these "major" items, because Popp has now been confirmed to testify to the federal Government Ethics Committee regarding his and Facebook's — on a global scale to get outed of Facebook over — and have an "outside independent" look at to this potential "national crisis over data as far-reaching as that can get. You never can run socialized corporations.
Nhận xét
Đăng nhận xét